To run, or not to run, that is the issue. It is better to walk at a faster pace with both feet leaving the firm ground at the same time or to slow down, with one foot always planted on solid ground. To walk. To relax, enjoy. And so to be. Sorry to Will, this is the debate that currently continues to be heard in health circles. Should we still be encouraging people to jog as the only form of fitness that is healthy and effective? Or could we encourage walking as an alternative that is safe and enjoyable? A little more than a decade in the past, there was no reason to doubt it. Running was everywhere it was the only way to go in the event that good health would be the result. The fun runs were plentiful and Monday mornings were filled with worksite chats were often centered around 10km or marathon times , and the aching muscles resulting. Nowadays, the streets are full of less active ambulators and walking enthusiasts, who believe that this is both a needed and sufficient activity for health. But is this both true? It's a simple question: "yes'. Both walking and running are excellent forms of exercise and they're both better than just sitting around - but with varying degrees of risks and advantages. As the runners of the 70's and 1980's will be able to tell you (and I'm among them) running can be an unwise pastime. Not because of any danger of injury sudden, as those in football or racing, but due to the consequences of long-term and continuous shaking. Tendonitis-related injuries, such as niggling as well as knee soreness, back pain and ankle stiffness are the mark of the running for the long distance runner. Visit:- https://healthandwellnesscircle.com/ Initially it was thought that the constant shaking could lead to permanent injury to the musculoskeletal tissues leading to an increase in diseases like arthritis. Nowadays, we know that this isn't the scenario. In reality, arthritis is likely to be lower in those who have lead an active lifestyle. It is more likely to become more severe when it comes to sports in which acute injuries are more common. Other forms of chronic muscular issues are not unusual however, particular in someone who does not have perfect balance between their legs, or who's running style isn't ideal. Another issue with encouraging running (or jogging) to those who are overweight and unfit is the danger this can cause. The strain placed on an unhealthy heart could result in a fatal event. Extra jarring caused by carrying the extra weight of your body can increase the damage suffered by regular joggers. More importantly the amount of effort required by such people makes this less enjoyable and thus unlikely to be sustained over time. However, there are many who would not deny the advantages of running which, for many people, far outweighs the expense. These benefits aren't just the well-known cardiovascular benefits and other benefits to physical health as well as the psychological benefits that are the psychological highs that come from covering large distances with ease. There's no doubt that these benefits are less apparent when walking. What about the other (health) advantages? This is where the athlete's defense gets stymied. In the 70's and 80's studies on exercise indicated that in order to reap the benefit from any kind of exercise, it needed to be vigorous and sustained. Therefore, running was generally thought of as more beneficial than walking. The research was conducted by sport's scientists , whose focus were, not without reason, in improving the performance of athletes. The benefits they studied therefore were related to physical fitness, and there's no doubt that it is increased more rapidly and in greater amounts when you run instead of walking. However, physical fitness does not necessarily mean good health. Although the two are related but one is not necessarily being the same as has been observed by the sudden death from heart attack in some fit athletes. So, when the earlier research was reviewed it was discovered that vigorous exercise isn't essential for health improvements such as a reduction in body weight and cholesterol levels, reduced blood sugars and lower blood pressure. It may enhance these benefits by increasing heart fitness, but it is not necessary to see significant improvements in health. Lack of movement in modern societies , it appears, has led to a health issue and any form of regular movement, like walking, can aid in addressing this. On the flip side walking isn't likely to provide (as much) psychological benefit or increased cardiovascular fitness as running. On the positive side, it is easier to do, less damaging on joints, and is able to offer beneficial health benefits. From an evolutionary standpoint, it is clear that human beings have been built to cover large distances while walking to obtain food and move locations. They also evolved to spend brief moments traveling at a higher rate to capture animals and compete with others in this species. It makes sense then that walking is the most popular fitness mode that's been created to improve health within an evolutionary context. A brief burst of more vigorous exercise could enhance these benefits, as is evident in most recent guidelines for physical activity, which suggest a program of regular walking, and some intense exercise whenever possible. The main challenge with exercising is whether it is sustainable throughout life. While most avid joggers (me including) would like to believe that they'll still be running the gates of heaven at age 101 (after having been shot by a jealous lover) but the reality is, most won't. Moving slower and on two feet at a pace that is designed to ensure at least an inch of ground constantly is a viable option, and one which is now being considered by large crowds of people. They should be pleased to hear of the potential benefits of doing so, without the potential pain.